Thoughts On The Vancouver Flooding

David Trammel's picture

Came across this on Facebook. It highlights how much of the way we have built in the past, just isn't going to work in the Future. Haven't had time to check all the links, though they look very Green Wizardie.
---

Javan Kerby Bernakevitch
https://www.facebook.com/javan.bernakevitch

Years ago I visited a farm with a friend. The owners were ranging bison on the land and heard I worked in regenerative land design. They asked if I would consider a problem, there was a creek that ran through their property and pasture. They had a question, "how do we turn this creek into pasture?”

While I had immediate reservations about their question I put a pause on my emotional reaction and instead asked for a little time to walk the land and give their request my full attention. After walking the part of the watershed their property was on I came back to the house.

They asked, “Do you have a solution?”

I replied I had come to a positive negative. Positive as it was potentially a bigger perspective that would help them manage their site towards the goal of raising better animals, and negative because my answer didn't fulfill their specific request. I said: "Before the first animals, let alone the first peoples on this land were here, this was a wetland. When animals and first peoples came it was a wetland and both worked with what this ecology provided... as a wetland. The ecological disruption that's happened since then hasn't changed the fact that the drainage that runs through this landscape is fed by kilometres of headwaters or that this water has for millennia created riparian soils and wetland ecology.

In short, this was a wetland before people came here and it will be a wetland after we're long gone. I suggest you accentuate the wetland feature, planting fodder and perennial species to use the water as a resource instead of forcing your views on the landscape. I know it's not what you wanted to hear but I'm an advocate for the land first, your money second and your wants third. Thiis land has always been and will always be a wetland. I suggest working with instead of against it.”

The land owner was somber for a moment and said, "That's the first piece of good advice we've received in 5 years. We've paid thousands of dollars to consultants of which the last suggestion was to take the soil down 6 feet and regrade everything. But what you're saying actually makes sense.”

In the modern world we have placed our infrastructure with complete disregard to the ecology that keeps us alive. We’ve sized our culverts and drainages thinking that major events could never happen and then denuded the landscape of the vegetative sponge (and added to wildfire’s intensity and frequency through a policy of exclusion and suppression) that slows, spreads and sinks water for times of scarcity and drought, only to have violent, powerful and destructive events like we’ve experienced this past week in British Columbia, Canada.
We’ve removed the animals that have kept water in the landscape like beavers. We’ve put more water into the atmosphere and by doing so changed the climate to a state that hasn’t been experienced before (see Walter Jehne’s work on this for more info); And according to some scientists is more dangerous for climate chaos than carbon.

There’s amazing posts about how Roman roads have withstood the test of time. The real reason? They were placed in places that were out of water cycles.

After mentoring with Sepp Holzer years ago there’s a point he made that came to me when the Calgary floods were at their peak in 2013 and has recently been on my mind.
“People put their roads in the valleys. It’s stupid. They're dummkopfs (German for idiot or block head). They never learn. Valleys are for water, not roads.”

We’re in, as Brad Landcaster (amazing practitioner and teacher of Rainwater Harvesting in Tucson, Arizona, USA) calls it, the DRAIN age and we need to move into the RETAIN age.
What we’re seeing in British Columbia, Canada, Indonesia and India today is a complete and utter disregard for the ecology that keeps us alive and, whether or not we admit it, are an intimate part of. This image of Highway 1 in British Columbia is a testament that we have disregarded the ecology that keeps us alive to our detriment and peril.

I urge everyone reading this to consider that the human world you think is stable has been built on a house of cards that is wobbling in some places and collapsing in others.
It’s not climate change, it’s climate changed. Ecological disruption has turned into, as it always has been, human disruption. We are in a time of adaption. If you are in denial your commitment to that denial will widen the gap between fiction and reality and the shock that awaits you on the other side.

If this is new to you, I invite you to learn all you can about how to live and work with our ecology. To every day become more food secure. To direct your livelihood towards adaptation and regenerative living - the live on the planet as if we intend to stay. I don’t say this as someone who’s at a pinnacle of these thoughts, but who, like you is moving along this unknown path not knowing what’s at the end but is aware of what’s underneath my feet.
--
Jackass Mountain Hill
Highway #1 British Columbia, Canada
Photo Credit - Wesley Phibbs
--
Edit 1: Yes, you are more than welcome to share this.

Edit 2: Wow, thanks for all the shares and comments folks. Your additions to this conversation are very welcome.

Edit 3: I'm not accepting friend requests at the moment but you're welcome to follow this account or my business account.

Edit 4: Folks have been asking what's a good first step to become more food secure. Food Security is a passion of mine and my colleague and friend Natalie Pepin, a Metis Homesteader and Farmer. Together we offer a few ways (free and paid) to help folks through the mistakes and successes of building personal and family food security, including:

- A free hour long introduction to food security (sign up for a free account to access the introduction)
https://rlaw.learnworlds.com/course/familyfood

- A free food security community to share and support your food security efforts (Natalie)
https://family-food-security.mn.co

- Help us with our BAG (Big Audacious Goal) to reach 10,000 families and create 1,000 food secure families in 2022 by becoming a Food Security Ambassador. Sign up here - https://forms.gle/HY1FjZ2tpbKJNswq5

- A 60 day Food Security Challenge to build your personal and family's IMMEDIATE food security (Natalie)
http://www.reskilledlife.com/60-day-food-security-challenge/

- A 7 Month season long step by step guided course to help folks Plan, Buy, Grow, Trade and Wild Harvest your personal and family's LONG TERM food supply that starts February 8 2022 BUT we are meeting once a month before the course starts as it's always a good time to build your food security.
https://rlaw.learnworlds.com/course/familyfood

add photo: 

I really can't argue. The places that are flooded right now are built in floodplains, for the most part. Add record-breaking rains, and what else was going to happen? Unfortunately there's not a lot of good farmland in BC, and most of the really good stuff is in the bottoms of river valleys. So people will farm it, and it will flood, and you get a natural disaster. I would like to see less urban development in floodplains, though. That's even riskier in terms of human life, and a lot less vital to put in that specific spot than farms.

As for the highways, you can't really build them on the ridges of the rocky mountains or the coast range, so you build in the valley bottoms or the valley walls. The former are vulnerable to flooding, the latter to landslides and avalanches. The geography of BC doesn't really give us any good options if we want east-west ground links. Much of BC consists of north-south mountain ranges, and a few flatter spots around and in troughs between them. So we build highways through the mountains, and they get wrecked by landslides and need repairs again and again.

It's going to be very expensive in future, and we may not be able to keep as many east-west ground links in operation a few decades from now. And they may spend more time shut down and unuseable. But there are no good options here.

I mean, you could fly everything over the mountains, but the energy cost of that is insane and it wouldn't fly for long.